Every case is different. Settlements and verdicts in all cases depend on various factors and circumstances which are unique to each individual case. Past case results are not a guarantee or prediction of similar results in future cases.

Personal Injury Blog

  • Maryland Passes Bill to Change Liability for Pit Bull Bites

    Posted By Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata, Siegel, P.C. || 22-Apr-2014

    By: Ira Sherman

    In early March, the Maryland Senate unanimously passed a bill that overhauls the current status of Pit Bull liability in the state of Maryland. In June of 2012, we wrote about Tracy v. Solesky, the Court of Appeals decision that imposed strict liability on the owner of any Pit Bull that attacked and injured a human being. The benefit of this decision was that it eliminated the "first bite" rule – meaning that an injured plaintiff no longer had to prove that the dog had previously bitten another human. This rule frequently created an insurmountable hurdle because often the most likely person to know of a previous bite, the owner, would never divulge the information and would therefore avoid liability.

    Maryland Dog Bite Lawyer

    This case was met with a strong backlash on social media, with advocates stating that Pit Bulls as a breed should not be unfairly discriminated against. They also spread campaign materials stating that it was the upbringing and training, rather than the breed type, that determined aggressiveness. This campaign caused such a strong enough effect on the Maryland legislature that it completely did away with breed distinctions in the new bill.

    This bill does not bring back the "first bite" rule, but plaintiffs are now required to show that the dog previously exhibited a propensity for violence, such as aggressive behavior. Consequently, on a case by case basis, a judge or jury will determine what, aside from a bite, constitutes aggressive behavior. The bill, however, does have one plaintiff friendly clause, which imposes strict liability on dogs who attack and injure a human while running at large. This coincides with the mindset that proper upbringing and training determines a dog's aggressiveness because a responsible owner will not allow an aggressive dog to run free, and a responsible owner will also provide the training needed to minimize or eliminate aggressive tendencies.

    Unfortunately, approximately 70% of dog bites occur on the owner's property, rather than when the dog is running free. So, the majority of dog bite cases will face the difficult task of showing that the dog had a past propensity for violence. We'll have to watch the evolving case law to see if this turns into yet another insurmountable hurdle.

    If you were injured as a result of a dog bite, please contact the Maryland personal injury lawyers at Chaikin, Sherman, Cammarata & Siegel, P.C. to discuss your rights.

Free Case Evaluation

Free Case Evaluation

Fill out the information below to request your consultation.

Send Information